C
CraftExam
medium difficulty9 min

de Broglie Explanation of Bohr Quantisation

de Broglie's explanation says that an electron in a stable Bohr orbit behaves as a matter wave forming a standing wave around the nucleus, so the circumference of the orbit must contain an integral number of wavelengths: 2πr = nλ.

In one line: A permitted orbit is a closed wave loop with no loose end.

Concept Practice Coming Soon

Understand it

If the electron wave does not fit exactly around the orbit, the wave would not join smoothly with itself and the orbit would not be stable. Stable orbits occur only when the circular path length equals a whole number of de Broglie wavelengths. Using λ = h/mv, the condition 2πr = nλ gives mvr = nh/2π, which is Bohr's angular momentum quantisation.

Example

For the first Bohr orbit, n = 1, so the circumference contains one complete de Broglie wavelength. For n = 2, it contains two complete wavelengths.

Formula and rule

Standing-wave condition: 2πr = nλ, where r is orbit radius in m, n is a positive integer, and λ is de Broglie wavelength in m. de Broglie relation: λ = h/mv, with h in J s, m in kg, and v in m s−1.

Combining them gives mvr = nh/2π.

See it worked out

Follow the example line by line, then use the same method on new questions.

Worked example

Show that de Broglie's condition gives Bohr's rule.

  1. 1Start with 2πr = nλ.
  2. 2Substitute λ = h/mv.
  3. 3Then 2πr = nh/mv.
  4. 4Multiplying both sides by mv gives 2πmvr = nh.
  5. 5Therefore, mvr = nh/2π.
  6. 6Final result: angular momentum is quantised.

Method you can reuse

  1. 1State that electron has de Broglie wavelength λ = h/mv.
  2. 2State stable orbit condition 2πr = nλ.
  3. 3Substitute λ.
  4. 4Rearrange carefully to get mvr = nh/2π.
  5. 5Explain that n must be an integer for a standing wave.

Visual tip

A diagram may show a circular orbit with one, two, or three complete matter wavelengths fitted around it. Label orbit radius r, wavelength λ, and the condition 2πr = nλ.

Check yourself

Answer the question in your head before opening the answer.

Try it yourself

How does de Broglie's idea justify Bohr's quantisation condition?

Think first, then show answer
de Broglie's idea treats the electron as a matter wave. A stable orbit is possible only when the electron wave forms a standing wave around the orbit, so 2πr = nλ. Substituting λ = h/mv gives mvr = nh/2π, which is Bohr's angular momentum quantisation.

Common wrong answer

A common wrong answer is saying quantisation happens because the electron's speed is zero in a stationary orbit. Stationary orbit means fixed allowed energy, not a stationary electron.

Don't mix this up

Students often write 2πr = λ/n instead of 2πr = nλ. The orbit circumference must be a whole-number multiple of the wavelength.

Exam tip

In derivations, start from the standing-wave condition and then substitute λ = h/mv to reach mvr = nh/2π.

Write it in the exam

Each point is worth about one mark. Write point 1 for a 1-mark question and keep adding points as the marks go up.

How CBSE asks it

Usually asked as a derivation or short conceptual explanation: why only certain Bohr orbits are allowed, or how standing matter waves lead to angular momentum quantisation.
  1. 1

    Enough for 1 mark

    de Broglie's explanation says that an electron in a stable Bohr orbit behaves as a matter wave forming a standing wave around the nucleus, so the circumference of the orbit must contain an integral number of wavelengths: 2πr = nλ.

  2. 2

    Add for 2 marks

    Example: For the first Bohr orbit, n = 1, so the circumference contains one complete de Broglie wavelength. For n = 2, it contains two complete wavelengths.

  3. 3

    Add for 3 marks

    If the electron wave does not fit exactly around the orbit, the wave would not join smoothly with itself and the orbit would not be stable.

Practice

Concept practice is coming soon

Login to access concept-level MCQs and weak-concept practice as they become available.

10 MCQs5 MinutesInstant Results
Login

Help improve this page

Found something confusing, incorrect, or missing?