Iterative division for HCF
Iterative division for HCF is a step-by-step method where the larger number is divided by the smaller number, then the divisor and remainder are used again until the remainder becomes 0. The last non-zero remainder is the HCF.
Practice This ConceptLearn the concept
Student-friendly explanation
The HCF does not change when the larger number is replaced by the smaller number and the remainder. That is why the same logic can be used again and again, making the numbers smaller at every step. The method is fast and neat in exam work.
How to write this in exams
- 1
Start with the exact idea
Iterative division for HCF is a step-by-step method where the larger number is divided by the smaller number, then the divisor and remainder are used again until the remainder becomes 0. The last non-zero remainder is the HCF.
- 2
Then show how to use it
1. Divide the larger number by the smaller number. 2. Write the remainder. 3. Replace the pair by divisor and remainder. 4. Continue until remainder is 0. 5. The last non-zero remainder is the HCF.
- 3
Add one concrete example
For 252 and 198: 252 = 198 x 1 + 54, 198 = 54 x 3 + 36, 54 = 36 x 1 + 18, 36 = 18 x 2 + 0. So the HCF is 18.
- 4
Avoid this incomplete answer
Taking 36 as the HCF in the worked example is wrong because 36 is not the last non-zero remainder.
Definition
Example
Rule to remember
Memory hook
Examples and method
Worked example
Method to apply
Diagram support
How CBSE asks it
Avoid common mistakes
Common confusion
Common wrong answer
Exam tip
Quick check
In repeated division, why do we replace the pair with divisor and remainder?
Because the HCF stays the same, and the numbers become smaller until the last non-zero remainder is reached.
Answer writing and exam use
1-mark answer
2-mark answer
3-mark answer
Practice this concept with focused MCQs
Open the concept quiz intro first, review the test details, and then start a focused MCQ set from this concept only. Instant score and answer review are live now.
Help improve this page
Found something confusing, incorrect, or missing?